510(k) SUBSTANTIAL EQUIVALENCE DETERMINATION
DECISION SUMMARY
DEVICE AND INSTRUMENT TEMPLATE
A.
510(k) Number: k0411039
B.
Purpose for Submission:
Clearance of whole blood glucose test system
C.
Analyte: Whole Blood glucose
D.
Type of Test: Electrochemical
biosensor
F.
Proprietary and Established Names:
HERS MEDICAL Check Blood Glucose Test System
G.
Regulatory Information:
1.
Regulation section:
21
CFR § 862.1345, Glucose test system
21
CFR § 862.1660, Quality control material (assayed and unassayed)
NBW,
Blood glucose test system, over the counter
CGA,
Glucose test system
JJX,
Single (specified) analyte controls (assayed and unassayed)
H.
Intended Use:
1.
Intended use(s):
HERS MEDICAL Check
Blood Glucose test system is intended for use in the quantitative
measurement of glucose in whole blood
taken from the finger.
It is intended for use by healthcare professionals and people with
diabetes mellitus at home as an aid in monitoring the effectiveness of
diabetes control program. It is not intended for the diagnosis of or
screening for diabetes mellitus, and is not intended for use on
neonates.
2.
Indication(s) for use:
3.
Special condition for use statement(s):
For
over the counter and professional use
4.
Special instrument Requirements:
HERS MEDICAL Check Glucose meter
HERS MEDICAL Check Blood Glucose test system consists of a glucose
test meter, test strips, two levels of control solution, and a
commercially available (510(k) cleared) lancing device.
J.
Substantial Equivalence Information:
1.
Predicate device name(s):
Bayer Glucometer Elite Diabetes Care System
2.
Predicate K number(s):
3.
Comparison with predicate:
The
device and the predicate share the same intended use and test
principle. Additional similarities and differences are listed below.
|
Similarities
|
|
Item |
Device |
Predicate |
|
Enzyme |
Glucose oxidase |
Glucose oxidase |
|
Test range |
20 – 600 mg/dL |
20 – 600 mg/dL |
|
Test strip
calibration |
Code strip |
Code strip |
|
Sample volume |
1.8 – 2.5 μL |
2 μL |
|
Differences |
|
Item |
Device |
Predicate |
|
Temperature and
humidity range |
10 – 40 ˚C
5 – 95 % RH |
10 – 40 ˚C
20 – 80 % RH |
|
Test time |
20 sec |
30 sec |
K.
Standard/Guidance Document Referenced (if applicable):
NCCLS Guideline EP5-A -
Evaluation of Precision Performance
of Clinical Chemistry Devices
NCCLS Guideline EP6-P2 -
Evaluation of the Linearity of
Quantitative Analytical Methods
NCCLS Guideline EP7-A -
Interference Testing in Clinical
Chemistry
NCCLS Guideline EP9-A -
Method Comparison and Bias
Estimation Using Patient Samples
prEN 13640
ISO 15197
IEC 60601-1 (1998), IEC
61010-1 (1990), EN 60601-1 (2001), EN 61010-1 (2001)
Once a whole
blood sample is applied to the sample chamber of the test strip,
glucose measurement commences. Glucose measurement is based on
electrical potential caused by the reaction of glucose with the
reagents contained on the strip’s electrodes. The glucose in the
sample is oxidized by the enzyme glucose oxidase, producing
gluconolactone. The current resulting from this enzymatic reaction is
measured and converted to glucose concentration by the meter.
The magnitude of the current is proportional to the
concentration of glucose in the sample.
M.
Performance Characteristics (if/when applicable):
1.
Analytical performance:
a.
Precision/Reproducibility:
Within day imprecision was evaluated by spiking samples to achieve 5
levels of glucose concentration. The low glucose sample was left at
room temperature until the glucose in the sample was depleted.
Samples were tested 20 times. This testing was performed at 3
different sites. Results are summarized below. (units = mg/dL)
|
Glucose Conc. |
Site 1 |
Site 2 |
Site 3 |
|
30-50 |
Mean |
44.8 |
45.2 |
43.9 |
|
SD |
1.48 |
1.14 |
1.29 |
|
% CV |
3.31 % |
2.52 % |
2.95 % |
|
51-110 |
Mean |
99.4 |
99.4 |
100.7 |
|
SD |
2.06 |
2.76 |
2.11 |
|
% CV |
2.07 % |
2.78 % |
2.09 % |
|
111-150 |
Mean |
141.3 |
134.3 |
142.8 |
|
SD |
3.13 |
5.38 |
4.06 |
|
% CV |
2.21 % |
4.01 % |
2.84 % |
|
151-250 |
Mean |
220.4 |
227.0 |
224.5 |
|
SD |
12.24 |
7.65 |
9.50 |
|
% CV |
5.55 % |
3.37 % |
4.23 % |
|
251-400 |
Mean |
305.9 |
327.8 |
328.2 |
|
SD |
11.14 |
7.71 |
8.59 |
|
% CV |
3.64 % |
2.35 % |
2.62 % |
Day to day imprecision was
evaluated by testing 3 levels of control solutions four times per day
for 20 days on each of two meters at each of 3 different test sites.
Results are summarized below. (units = mg/dL).
|
Glucose Conc. |
Site 1 |
Site 2 |
Site 3 |
|
60 – 80 |
Mean |
69.7 |
70.2 |
69.8 |
|
SD |
2.25 |
2.15 |
1.90 |
|
% CV |
3.22 % |
3.06 % |
2.73 % |
|
100 – 150 |
Mean |
126.8 |
126.1 |
126.7 |
|
SD |
2.99 |
5.39 |
2.59 |
|
% CV |
2.36 % |
4.28 % |
2.04 % |
|
Glucose Conc. |
Site 1 |
Site 2 |
Site 3 |
|
250 - 350 |
Mean |
315.6 |
319.2 |
323.4 |
|
SD |
8.84 |
10.19 |
8.89 |
|
% CV |
2.80 % |
3.19 % |
2.75 % |
b.
Linearity/assay reportable range:
Spiked recovery was evaluated by preparing spiked glucose samples
across the measuring range and comparing them to a laboratory
measurement of the same samples. Whole blood was depleted of glucose
by allowing it to sit at room temperature for 24 hours. The blood was
then spiked to 11 targeted glucose concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80,
120, 160, 200, 240, 320, 440, and 560 mg/dL). The spiked samples were
measured in duplicate and the resultant regression equation when the
observed results were plotted against results from a laboratory
reference method was y = 1.0705x + 16.215 (R2 = 0.997).
The
reportable range of the assay is 20 – 600 mg/dL.
c.
Traceability (controls, calibrators, or method):
Two
levels of control material (normal and high) are provided for use with
the test system. The target values are 125 mg/dL and 300 mg/dL and are
prepared gravimetrically in an aqueous matrix. Expected values are
verified for each manufactured lot. The open, closed, and transport
stability were tested.
e.
Analytical specificity:
The
sponsor tested the effects of hematocrit (20-60%), temperature,
humidity, resistance to drop and vibration, and high altitude (3275
meters) on the meter’s performance. The sponsor claims that there is
no effect of any of these factors on glucose results (defined as
within +/- 15 mg/dL difference in samples below 75 mg/dL and within
+/- 20% in samples above 75 mg/dL).
The
sponsor tested 6 exogenous and 2 endogenous substances for
interference with their meter. No interference (defined as +/- 10% of
control) was seen to the following concentrations:
Acetaminophen – up to 5 mg/dL
Ascorbic acid – up to 1.25 mg/dL
Dopamine – up to 2 mg/dL
L-Dopa
– up to 3 mg/dL
Methyl Dopa – up to >0.5 mg/dL
Tolbutamide – up to 200 mg/dL
Uric acid – up to 10 mg/dL
Triglyceride – up to 2000 mg/dL
The
insert states that no interferences are seen at normal physiological
levels of these potential interferents as the levels at which
interference is seen are above the normal observed physiological
concentrations of these substances.
2.
Comparison studies:
a.
Method comparison with predicate device:
Clinical technicians obtained blood glucose concentrations from 120
patients at 3 sites using the device and the results were compared to
results from venous blood samples from the same patients that were
analyzed on a clinical laboratory analyzer. The technician vs.
laboratory regression statistics are summarized below for the three
sites.
Site 1: Technician = 1.089(Lab) – 9.8276; r = 0.9869
Site 2: Technician = 1.0626(Lab) – 6.901; r = 0.9870
Site 3: Technician = 0.9952(Lab) + 1.8574; r = 0.9866
3. Clinical studies:
a. Clinical sensitivity:
c. Other clinical supportive data (when a and b
are not applicable):
Clinical technicians obtained blood glucose concentrations from 120
patients at 3 sites using the device and the results were compared to
results obtained when the same patients tested their own blood glucose
levels. The technician vs. user regression statistics are summarized
below for the three sites.
Site 1: User = 0.8647(Technician) + 15.477; r = 0.9785
Site 2: User = 0.9812(Technician) + 3.7056; r = 0.9863
Site 3: User = 0.9937(Technician) + 0.8674; r = 0.9900
Patients (n = 120) obtained blood glucose concentrations at 3 sites
using the device and the results were compared to results from venous
blood samples from the same patients that were analyzed on a clinical
laboratory analyzer. The user vs. laboratory regression statistics are
summarized below for the three sites.
Site 1: User = 0.9516(Lab) + 5.5478; r = 0.9882
Site 2: User = 1.0485(Lab) – 3.8361; r = 0.9844
Site 3: User = 0.9905(Lab) + 2.4982; r = 0.9800
One
hundred users (23 Europeans and 77 Taiwanese) were given the
instructions for use and asked to fill out a questionnaire relating to
the readability of the Instructions for Use. The insert evaluation
showed acceptable readability.
5.
Expected values/Reference range:
The
package insert indicates the following reference range for fasting
blood glucose: 70 – 110 mg/dL. The labeling advises that users should
consult their physician to determine their own appropriate range.
HERS MEDICAL Check Blood Glucose meter
O.
System Descriptions:
1. Modes of Operation:
Manual – insertion of test strip and sample application start the test
2.
Software:
software language – Assembly 6502
Requires RS232 interface, setting buttons, and test strip port
FDA has reviewed applicant’s Hazard Analysis and software development
processes for this line of product types:
Yes ___3___
or No ________
3.
Sample Identification:
Not
applicable. Sample is fresh capillary blood from a fingerstick. The
meter stores up to 180 test results.
4.
Specimen Sampling and Handling:
Manual – sample (fresh whole blood) acquired by fingerstick
Calibration information is contained on a coding strip that is
contained in each test strip vial. The user codes the meter with the
lot code strip and the meter stores the calibration information for
strips with that code.
Two
levels of quality control material are provided with the system.
P.
Other Supportive Instrument Performance Characteristics Data
Not Covered In The “L. Performance Characteristics” Section Of The SE
Determination Decision Summary:
The
submitted information in this premarket notification is complete and
supports a substantial equivalence decision.
proof Pen Shape